calling for a boycott of "Lech" Why? Let me explain. I think this says more about the boycott of the organizers of a boycott than advertisers. And as I mentioned about the owner's manual, it does not martwiłabym about him, because it seems that the ad "Cold Lech" communicates that the company is close to collapse Kulczyk. And here we agree with Czarnecki, except that I have come to such conclusions are quite different. A what? Soon it here present.
Why irritates me alone share a boycott of beer? Why raise my mixed feelings? Because there is more talk about themselves bojkotujących associations, rather than to the bojkotowanej company.
Who said that cold, "Lech", a "cold body of President Lech Kaczynski? Where is it said? Where is this written? Password "Cold Lech", is a very generic message, almost like ink blot test Rorschach. Since this is an ambiguous message, you may each be associated with something else. I never came to mind that can mean a dead Lech Kaczynski! Brrr, pass me the shivers just thinking that you can even think so ...
my opinion, this is only the fantasies of those who suffer consciously, and perhaps less conscious fear of death, of annihilation. The protest reflects only the emotions that triggered among some Poles, shortly after the crash Smolensk. This is the same fear, which apparently unite Poles under the President's palace, and was actually a defense mechanism, which was to "protect" the threat from the outside possibly.
Please tell me who in their right mind, would pay for the beer, which is the symbolization of death? Even assuming that the cold, "Lech", a dead Lech Kaczynski (uffffff, could hardly speak the association) is the word "experience Thirsty? Have a cup of cold Lech", could be read like this: "The Thirsty Death? It's a cold drink Lech" ("This drink this poison").
This may be another way to read; Cool "Lech", the message of disintegrating "ego" of the company, which produces beer. Only I doubt PR - wcy Kulczyk group seemed aware of this, what to communicate. People in Public Relations parający seemingly familiar with psychoanalysis, are very vain about her concept. I know something about this, because once I participated in quite a strong dispute with the company's PR-wcami play at some blog journalists Wroclaw. They do not realize what psychoanalysis symbolizes the "tongue" (eg sexual harassment psychorysunku means), so the devaluation of my arguments. And I meant it
: . Most of these PR- wców is behavioryści, and those are the opposition to psychoanalysis, and often not familiar with the psychoanalytic symbolism, and often fight psychoanalysts, because they feel they need to practice certain behaviors and the symptom disappears, and psychoanalysts argue that the symptom does not disappear, but shifts ; thus a need for longer treatment, often many years. In the eyes of psychiatrists, advertisers, tell more about themselves than they are aware of the content really communicate. Besides, I still need to be aware that the Polish PR-wcy present a much lower level of knowledge than from abroad. Hence, it is not worth assign magical wizards mocy.To not ... Do not be omnipotent.
probably liable to some PiS supporters (and even politicians), especially those who like beer, but I must also point out that someone often reaches for a beer, it is close to alcoholism. And as alcohol dependence, is already a strong likelihood that there is a lesser or greater degree of anxiety schizophrenia - paranoid (non prześladowczym), which in turn are suppressed with further alcohol (eg beer). And therefore I would prefer that the policies, calling for a boycott of "Lech" not announcing to the world that he is a connoisseur of beer ... It can always raise suspicions that being a connoisseur, it's too frequent use of alcohol. A to alcoholism is not far off. Can also be an alcoholic too often reaching for a beer. Who does not believe me, let him read it himself, even
here.
why am calling PiS politicians who emerged from the Initiative, so again not przeszarżowali these acacias, because they can expose up to ridicule and cause Palikot! And who excels in this action? Well, of course you Migalski again ... And this is supposed to be called. PR success for the party?
I have yet another very good combination. This time the intention of the organizers of the boycott concern. Assuming that "Lech" is a symbolization L. Kaczynski (in the minds of some politicians PiS, because in my at all), the PiS politicians who call for boycott of "Lech", it really call for a boycott of his brother Kaczyńskiego.No Lech itself because you can not boycott. From such thoughts? Because our fantasies / associations also say unconsciously expressed by our desires and needs (analysis of metaphors can be made at different levels). Therefore, I believe that those who associate the cold, "Lech" with Kaczynski, symbolically express their needs to eliminate from the political life of J. Kaczynski. This boycott is really confronting symbology between the liberal part of the PiS and the bj conservative. This boycott is also niewyrażony straight (and symbolically) anger and aggression in relation to the J. Kaczynski. This is called. displacement of aggressive feelings in a symbolic "Object" - beer "Lech".
You see how many associations may cause indeterminate message ads "Lech"? Which interpretation is more true? Those who organize boycotts, or mine? Or maybe none of them reflect the truth? Before the psychoanalyst is convinced about the importance of the metaphor, has to carry out verification of the hypothesis rather complicated. Does not interpret ambiguous messages as fast as some politicians PiS .... Under the influence of emotions ... Psychoanalyst makes complex intellectual operations, before they get the correct symbol ...
Therefore, calling for a boycott of the boycott, because more may be harmed by the PiS-i, than to create him a good advertisement ... Important! At the corner of Palikot ...
PS.1
But those who come out of the crypt with the sarcophagus of Lech Kaczynski and Maria and they see a huge banner advertising "Cold Lech" this may be associated. The question is whether this banner erected there on purpose?
PS.2 And one more thing, if your ad raises such a strong fear of going out of the vault, then who reach for the beer, "Lech"? Who will buy? It really depends on the brewer of beer consumption fall? It seems to me that the banner was placed there mindlessly.
PS.3 I've never had such associations with the "Cold Lech", only "Rzeczpospolita" threw me such "important." I think writing such an article and add some leaning closer to me not a known expert - a professor of persuasion (I note that it is not a psychoanalyst, and what that professor?), "Rzeczpospolita" only strengthens this association, and not extinguished. And if we want to protect themselves from such a negative association, it is sufficient to erase them from consciousness.